On Dec 14, 2009, at 8:21 AM, Tony Li wrote:
Robin Whittle wrote:
Short version: The RRG Design Goals document cold be used as the
basis for a "template", but was based on very
little discussion and AFAIK has not achieved
consensus.
Robin,
When the discussion of the design goals slowed, we judged that to
indicate rough consensus.
(no hat) consensus should be explicitly solicited, rather than
implicitly assumed.
BTW folks I'm having problems access the RRG WIKI page (when I tried
to login, got database error), will try again later to get the current
proposal candidates added there.
Lixia
I suggest that concise summaries mention how
suitable the proposal is for voluntary adoption in
IPv4 and IPv6 - perhaps with reference to this list
of constraints:
http://www.firstpr.com.au/ip/ivip/RRG-2009/constraints/
While you're more than welcome to do so, this is not a requirement.
Tony
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
