Hi Xiaohu, > No. if you see the LP record and its usage (see the following quotes) in > ILNP, you will infer that the multiple identifiers associated with a given > FQDN belong to a single host, rather than different hosts. > > "...In the new scheme, site multi-homing works in a similar manner, > with nodes having one Locator for each upstream connection to > the Internet. To avoid a DNS Update burst when a site or > subnetwork moves location, a DNS record optimisation is > possible. This would change the number of DNS Updates required > from Order(number of nodes at the site/subnetwork that moved) > to Order(1). [ILNP-DNS] " > "
I've read this over multiple times and am not following you. Yes, there needs to be a clarification that multiple I records are independent hosts. There should be one identifier per host, no more, no less. There are, of course, multiple locators per host. Tony _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
