On 2010-03-02 12:36, [email protected] wrote:
...
> Statement: Neither LISP nor any of all the other submitted solutions do
> reduce the number of routes
> - not even by the number 1.
IMHO the issue is not to reduce the number of routes but to limit
their growth. At the moment they seem to be limited loosely like
the square root of the size of the Internet, and our goal is presumably
to limit them more strongly than that -- log(N) would be lovely.
There is a lot of speculation in this, but since the pressure towards
route de-aggregation seems to come mainly from PI addressing and the
demand for multihoming, a solution that enables PA aggregation seems
certain to limit growth, compared to doing nothing. There are a number
of solutions in the list that appear to do this.
Brian
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
