Hi Paul, You wrote:
>> You have asserted there is no routing scaling problem, > > Did I? > >> Could you go perhaps go back to my message where I said how I >> wished to vote. I think you'll find you've misunderstood me. I have not mentioned anything about voting - there is no voting in the RRG, and I understand no attempt will be made to seek or reach consensus on the final recommendation. (msg06220) I thought that you were arguing against the existence of the routing scaling problem, because in your first message in this thread, you wrote: > However, it does not seem justified to say the current routing > architecture has a scaling problem. Since I have difficulty understanding what you describe as your "scribblings" in a manner you agree with, I will not pursue this discussion further except to note that: 1 - I was not complaining about "TTBOMLK". 2 - I disagree with your "Let the data do the arguing." - people can argue, data can't. 3 - Our arguments must concern our reasonable fears about the future, since we have no data about the future. - Robin _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list rrg@irtf.org http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg