Hi Paul,
You wrote:
>> You have asserted there is no routing scaling problem,
>
> Did I?
>
>> Could you go perhaps go back to my message where I said how I
>> wished to vote. I think you'll find you've misunderstood me.
I have not mentioned anything about voting - there is no voting in
the RRG, and I understand no attempt will be made to seek or reach
consensus on the final recommendation. (msg06220)
I thought that you were arguing against the existence of the routing
scaling problem, because in your first message in this thread, you wrote:
> However, it does not seem justified to say the current routing
> architecture has a scaling problem.
Since I have difficulty understanding what you describe as your
"scribblings" in a manner you agree with, I will not pursue this
discussion further except to note that:
1 - I was not complaining about "TTBOMLK".
2 - I disagree with your "Let the data do the arguing." - people
can argue, data can't.
3 - Our arguments must concern our reasonable fears about the
future, since we have no data about the future.
- Robin
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
rrg@irtf.org
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
