+1 on this.
-S.
Noel Chiappa wrote:
> From: Tony Li <[email protected]>
> Here's the next pass at section 17. Please comment.
> ...
> We selected Aggregation in Increasing Scopes ...
> We recommended ILNP ...
> We recommend further work on automating renumbering ...
'We' can be a bit of an unbound free variable, if readers aren't paying close
attention. How about, in the three specific instances I list, substituting
'The co-chairs'?
(I don't propose changing all instances of 'we', that would make the document
too clunky. The three I list seem like the most important places to have
complete clarity.)
Noel
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
