> From: Scott Brim <[email protected]>
> I don't know of anyone.
Good, then it shouldn't be controversial! :-)
(Seriously, though, I am reliably informed, by someone who's currently out
trying to 'sell' a location/identity split scheme, that they do exist.)
>> 'The RRG did reach a rough consensus that it is both desirable to
>> separate location and identity, and also technically feasible to do
>> so.'
> As long as you don't try to define identity.
Which is part of why I stuck with the generic concept terms 'location' and
'identity', and didn't use any specific examplars of either.
But seriously, if anyone disagrees with that concept, let's hear it,
otherwise I would like to ask Tony to include it as a 'group endorsed
high-level recommendation'.
Noel
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
