> Does anyone else think global/universal uniqueness > of the identifier is the wrong objective? : I think that if that is the only acceptable identifier : that privacy advocates would have a major issue. >From the operator community, I would say that in the long run it wouldn't only >be security advocates that'd have an issue and global/universal uniqueness of >the identifier will have an adverse affect on acceptance of a New Thing. scott ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique identifier Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique identif... Scott Brim
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique ide... Tony Li
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique ide... Toni Stoev
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique ide... Javier Ubillos
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique ide... Toni Stoev
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique identif... Klaas Wierenga
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique identifier Joel M. Halpern
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique identifier HeinerHummel
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique identifier HeinerHummel
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique identifier Scott Weeks
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique identifier Toni Stoev
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique identifier Toni Stoev
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique identifier Toni Stoev
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique identifier Scott Weeks
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique identifier Toni Stoev
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique identifier Klaas Wierenga
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique identifier Toni Stoev
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique identifier Javier Ubillos
- Re: [rrg] Universally unique identif... Toni Stoev
