Fred,

Assuming that you want to go down the IRSG document path, we can issue a last 
call on these documents.  This should give two weeks for others to comment.  If 
there are no comments, we can do a consensus check (another week) and then pass 
to the IRSG.

The path that you take is up to you.

Regards,
Tony


On Aug 6, 2010, at 1:14 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:

> There is now a new version of the IRON spec which has made a
> large number of improvements and additions:
> 
>  http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-templin-iron-09.txt
> 
> Most notable in this version are:
> 
>  1) use of anycast for discovering addresses of nearby
>     serving routers
>  2) Analysis of "nested EUNs"
>  3) Only one serving IR[VE] for each EUN permitted
>  4) Multiple IR[CE]s for each EUN permitted
> 
> As far as I can tell, the bulk of the questions and
> comments raised in review input have been addressed,
> although I am more than willing to be corrected if that
> is not the case. So, please feel free to send any
> additional comments you may have.
> 
> Per RFC5743, it appears that the next step is to offer the
> document for IRSG Review and Approval in which "the IRSG
> functions similar to an editorial review board". After that,
> "The IRTF Chair will then extend the Internet Engineering
> Steering Group (IESG) an opportunity to review the document
> according to the process and scope described in [RFC5742]."
> 
> I could use some RRG chair guidance on how I go about
> initiating these next steps? Or, should I scrap the RFC5743
> process and just go straight to the Independent submission
> stream process per RFC5742?
> 
> Thanks - Fred
> [email protected] 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>> Templin, Fred L
>> Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 5:10 PM
>> To: Robin Whittle; RRG
>> Subject: Re: [rrg] Pumping IRON
>> 
>> RRG,
>> 
>>> input. Therefore I am extending the review deadline until
>>> COB on 7/26/10 when the I-D repository re-opens.
>> 
>> I have received some additional useful comments off-list
>> that will be addressed in the next document version. I will
>> also be addressing a number of the points Robin has made in
>> his post to the list. So, please feel free to send additional
>> comments while I prepare the -09 for submission. This should
>> happen either later this week or early next week. We will
>> then proceed to the next phase of the publication procedure.
>> 
>> Thanks - Fred
>> [email protected]
>> _______________________________________________
>> rrg mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
> _______________________________________________
> rrg mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg

Reply via email to