Toni, you appear to be trying to assert that there is some sort of IRTF
Rough Consensus on what should be named by Locators.
Since the question heavily depends upon other factors, I for one chose
to ignore your asking an incomplete and underspecified question that is
unrelated to the agreed work items of the RRG.
I would also note that it is for the Chair (or chairs) to decide when an
idea or proposal has been discussed sufficiently, and has sufficient
relevance that determining WG Rough Consensus is called for. it is then
the chairs job to conduct that, and to draw the conclusion.
Yours,
Joel M. Halpern
On 9/29/2010 9:02 AM, Toni Stoev wrote:
...
So, do you consent that nodes (instead of interfaces) have to be referenced
with locators(addresses)/identifiers?
This time all of us (who expressed opinion) are for node reference (instead of
interface's).
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
