https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-narten-radir-problem-statement/ I can't remember if it was on this list or V6Ops, but does it make a difference that this is an individual contribution that is expired? Should we perhaps do the same consensus check and push to full RFC status as we have been doing with the individual proposals? Given the fact that it's fairly central to the discussion, I think that there's some value in this, assuming the author is willing to shepherd it.
Thanks, Wes -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony Li Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:43 AM To: IRTF RRG Subject: Re: [rrg] Consensus on inter/intra-domain routing separation Folks, According to my DRAM, the topics now in front of the RG are: - Comments on the recommendation, currently in IRSG review - Comments on the design goals document, which we should Last Call soon - Comments on ILNP, soon to be in IRSG review - Comments on IRON, currently in IRSG review - Discussion of future RG topics We can tolerate a certain amount of additional discussion, depending on its level of constructiveness. Non-constructive commentary is, of course, discouraged. Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg This e-mail may contain Sprint Nextel proprietary information intended for the sole use of the recipient(s). Any use by others is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies of the message. _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
