On 10/08/2010 02:41 EDT, Robin Whittle wrote: > Short version: This is in interesting and important I-D. > > I think it was written in a way which did not > consider TTR Mobility. I provide a description > of TTR Mobility and how the concerns and > recommendations of this I-D apply to it, vs. how > they apply to LISP Mobile or the use of a Loc/ID > Separation (CEE) architecture such as ILNP to > mobility.
Thank you. The main thing we wanted to do was to get protocol designers to make location privacy an explicit consideration. > I think that LISP Mobile or ILNP etc. are > incapable of meeting the first recommendation. I don't know if that's true at all. In fact I'm sure they can come up with a response, could answer the concern, and may have thought of the tradeoffs already. Let's not second-guess them. I'll respond to the detailed parts of your message later. Thanks again ... Scott _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
