Robin, > Fred, I am surprised you voted in support of publishing the current > draft. Section 3.4 states that Loc/ID Separation is "desired" and > then "required". This means CEE: GLI-Split, ILNP, Name-Based Sockets > or RANGI - not LISP, Ivip and IRON.
I have to admit that I voted like a sheep on this one instead of like a shepherd. As far as I'm concerned, the IRON approach is the right way forward (else I wouldn't be doing it), and if I missed something that argues to the contrary then I voted incorrectly. What do you say, Tony? Is this document trying to show favoritism toward a particular approach? Fred [email protected] _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
