Hi Tony, > Of course not. The point is to capture our goals and > articulate them as best we can.
OK. Just the same, it looks like I am going to have to go back now and actually *read* this document instead of just go with the flow - my mistake! It should also be noted that IRON is being considered in other venues right now including softwires, intarea and v6ops. It is of interest in those communities because it supports IPv6/IPv4 transition *and* coexistence. The "transition" part means "get there quickly" and the "coexistence" part means do it once and be done for good. IRON is a one-step solution in which we do it right the first time - not a two-step solution in which we slap up something temporary now then come back and do something (presumably) better later on. (Especially if the "later on" approach has shortcomings that the once-and-done approach does not.) Thanks - Fred [email protected] _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
