Note that we made the review for the -16. Since then there has been a
new version, so I guess we'll review it again. Are changes from -16 to
-17 substantial?
Jari
The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'The Internet Routing
Overlay Network (IRON)' <draft-templin-iron-17.txt> as an Experimental
RFC.
The IESG would also like the IRSG to review the comments in
the datatracker
(https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_id&dTag=19595&rfc_flag=0)
related to this document and determine whether or not they merit
incorporation into the document. Comments may exist in both the ballot
and the comment log.
The IESG contact person is Jari Arkko.
A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-templin-iron-17.txt
The process for such documents is described at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/indsubs.html.
Thank you,
The IESG Secretary
Technical Summary
This is a description of the IRON mechanism that
addresses routing scalability concerns in the Internet.
Working Group Summary
This is an independent submission via the RFC Editor,
but has been discussed in the IRTF Routing Research Group.
Document Quality
n.a.
Personnel
The Document Shepherd is Tony Li and the responsible
Area Director is Jari Arkko.
IESG Note
Per RFC 5742 our recommendation is the following for version -16
of this draft:
1. The IESG has concluded that there is no conflict between this
document and IETF work.
However, we understand that the IRTF is considering whether they
want to make further versions of the draft in order to introduce
some changes. The IESG is fine with this version of the draft but
we ask that if substantial changes are made then another IESG
review is initiated.
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
_______________________________________________
rrg mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
