On Jan 10, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Jari Arkko wrote: > Note that we made the review for the -16. Since then there has been a new > version, so I guess we'll review it again. Are changes from -16 to -17 > substantial?
Jari, By volume, the changes are moderate. However, they are semantically significant, IMHO. Regards, Tony _______________________________________________ rrg mailing list [email protected] http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/rrg
