On Dec 6, 2007, at 2:10 PM, Fleischman, Eric wrote:
I disagree with your final paragraph: VPN aggregations are definitely
still on the table within elements of our community. However, RRG
may --
or may not -- choose to consider that issue as we see fit.
We're all quite familiar with the use of VPNs in many contexts,
thanks. The initial post in this sub-thread seemed to imply that
large numbers of aerially-mobile nodes would have their traffic
aggregated together within some sort of tunnel, to wit:
>While considering these issues, I have formed the tentative opinion
that
>unanticipated requirements such as VPN-hosted communications radically
>change mobility considerations.
I disagree with the statement that VPN-hosted communications are
unanticipated, and I further disagree with the statement that they
radically change mobility considerations for this WG. VPNs will be
used in some instances, they won't be in others; irrespective of
their use or non-use in any given circumstance, I don't believe
there's any significance for this WG.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // 408.527.6376 voice
Culture eats strategy for breakfast.
-- Ford Motor Company
--
to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
