Tony, > > Where did you hide the NAT-PT box? And, once you have the NAT-PT > > box, why do you need LISP involved? > > I'm not sure it needs to be NAT-PT due to dual stack and/or > IPv4-in-IPv6 tunneling, but if NAT-PT were used then I don't > know why it wouldn't be co-located on the ITR.
So then another final remark, NAT-PT boxes belong on the site border routers of IPv6-only sites. That's about it, I think. Thanks - Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
