Dino, > But if you have a mapping database deployed, you may as well use it > and get the features that come along with it. So I see little value in
> using the 2002::/16 embedded IPv4 address as a locator. I think we agree, and all I am saying is that legacy 6to4 sites that do not yet have ITR/ETR nor a mapping capability can continue to use 6to4 until they do. With the 6to4 relay router acting as proxy ITR/ETR, I still see 6to4 as an incremental deployment vehicle toward full native IPv6 LISP/APT/etc. (Thereafter, 6to4 can fade away as you and Brian have said.) Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
