On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 11:31:42AM -0700, Tony Li wrote: > Ok, take 2: > > Our recommendation should be applicable to IPv6. It may or may not also > apply to IPv4, but at the very least must provide a path forward for IPv6.
I completely support that statement. It would certainly be nice to have an architectural solution that would be easily retrofitted into the IPv4 environment, but I suspect that anything involving IPv4 changes will suffer from the sheer scale of the problem. IPv6, on the other hand, is non-negotiable. I'd consider changing that first "should" to "must"...but that's wordsmithing at an unnecssary level of detail. -David -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
