Christian Vogt wrote:
Ok, take 2:
Our recommendation should be applicable to IPv6. It may or may not
also apply to IPv4, but at the very least must provide a path forward
for IPv6.
Would this allow for separate solutions for IPv4 and IPv6? RRG
shouldn't force itself to handle IPv4 with the same protocol that
handles IPv6 IMO.
I would strongly prefer a solution that can handle the EID/RLOC pairs of
v6/v6, v6/v4, and v4/v6. If it also handles v4/v4 as a side effect,
that may be useful or it may not.
S
--
to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the
word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
