>-----Original Message----- >From: Tony Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 4:04 PM >To: 'Brian E Carpenter'; 'RJ Atkinson' >Cc: 'IRTF Routing RG' >Subject: RE: [RRG] GSE History > > > > >|Of course, that was a long story in itself but I think >|people were deeply concerned about several points, and >|the proponents of 8+8 didn't answer those points >|(well, not until quite recently). And meanwhile, a lot >|of Classic IPv6 code has shipped, so software inertia >|has appeared. > > >Of course, you also have to wonder just how much inertia there >is when the >predominant implementation can't do DNS over v6. ;-)
"can't do", or didn't see the value and chose not to do? (NB: AFAICT, the implementation can still resolve AAAA's just fine...) Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] >I, for one, am to the point where all claims of "we can't >change" are simply >folks trying to justify "we don't want change". Sorry, >non-starter. This >is life and change is inevitable. Unless you're still using a >telegraph key >as your primary data communications tool, you're capable of change. > >Tony > > >-- >to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the >word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. >archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg > -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
