>-----Original Message----- >From: Tony Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 4:23 PM >To: Templin, Fred L; 'Brian E Carpenter'; 'RJ Atkinson' >Cc: 'IRTF Routing RG' >Subject: RE: [RRG] GSE History > > > > >|>Of course, you also have to wonder just how much inertia there >|>is when the >|>predominant implementation can't do DNS over v6. ;-) >| >|"can't do", or didn't see the value and chose not to do? >|(NB: AFAICT, the implementation can still resolve AAAA's >|just fine...) > > >Dunno. You're asking about motivations, and those are opaque >to me. All I >know is that those of us that have to use that OS suffered when v4 was >disabled at the last IETF technical plenary. This was why...
Somehow, I think this may not have come as a major surprise wrt the way the experiment was conducted? >From being in software development, my best guess is that the development >here didn't quite make code freeze. Tho I'm surprised it hasn't shown up in >a service pack. IPv6 implementations have been actively developed and well understood for a long time, so there has to be a reason. I think you are right though that to try to guess it would be to try to devine motivations... Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Tony > -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
