Dino, >-----Original Message----- >From: Dino Farinacci [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 3:13 PM >To: Brian E Carpenter >Cc: RRG >Subject: Re: [RRG] A data point on transit MTU size > >> We've argued here about whether it's reasonable to assume >1500 byte >> MTU on transit links, when running a LISP-type solution. > >And if the assumption doesn't hold, then you fragment before >encapsulate. That is specified in the main LISP spec.
1) You can't use IPv4 fragmentation if DF=1. 2) You can't send at high data rates if you use IPv4 fragmentation. IMHO, LISP should be SEALed. I will be here and ready to talk about it whenever you are. Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Dino > >> Here's a data point about the real world, as far as Internet >exchange >> points at the southern end go: >> >> http://list.waikato.ac.nz/pipermail/nznog/2008-September/014471.html >> >> Brian >> >> -- >> to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word >> 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. >> archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg > > >-- >to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the >word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. >archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg > -- to unsubscribe send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body. archive: <http://psg.com/lists/rrg/> & ftp://psg.com/pub/lists/rrg
