>> Sure! But they are not the same stuff. What I was looking for is >> >> it "should do #1" do >> ... >> end >> it "should do X after #1" do >> given_it "should do #1" >> should do_x >> end >> it "should do Y after #1" do >> given_it "should do #1" >> should do_y >> end >> it "should do Z after #1 Y" do >> given_it "should do Y after #1" >> should do_z >> end > > Sorry mate - that just seems like endless confusion - the examples > should never rely on each other that way - different animal from > scenarios that involve steps.
I agree that they should not rely on each other _indirectly_. But why they should not _reuse_ each other? I find it very useful for testing, say, different aspects of, say, controller's behavior. I simply do not want to put all checks into one example, like it should do this, this and this and in result we should have this, this and that. How do you propose to test different aspects of single actions in a nice way? _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
