On 9/21/07, Yurii Rashkovskii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Then I will have tens of methods that in fact has nothing really > different from reused examples
But, as methods, they are more clearly differentiated for reuse. The problem is that if I reuse an example, and then decide to change that example, I may accidentally change the meaning of other examples. This is possible w/ helper methods too, but I think it is less likely. You can keep pursuing this if you like, but I can tell you right now that it is very likely not going to happen. We already have a few different ways to deal w/ reuse and this one seems more confusing to me than helpful. FWIW, David > > On Sep 21, 2007, at 11:14 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > If you want to reuse stuff in your tests put those test methods in > > a separate module and include them into you specs > > Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile > > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
