On Dec 13, 2007 8:59 AM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/13/07, Daniel Tenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Then I definitely think there's little point in specifying what > > "deliver_secret_santa" is called with. The chances that you'll get > > that wrong are extremely small, and even if you do it will be picked > > up instantly by your integration tests, and be very easy to fix. > > > > What's much more likely to break is SantasMailbox - so focus the > > time, the effort, and the lines of code on speccing that quite > > thoroughly, so you know it can take every likely Message that you > > might throw at it. > > > > (/opinion) > > Well IMHO, I think that it's important to spec both. Even though the > callback is simple, it's a crucial design point, and I'm not unknown > to break such assumptions as code progresses. > > > It shouldn't be so hard to do either, I just can't figure out now, > why rspec seems to be calling the create in my spec twice.
This is a bit scary :( Rick - would you mind sticking this information, a bit filtered, into the tracker? > > > -- > Rick DeNatale > > My blog on Ruby > http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
