On Dec 13, 2007 4:57 AM, Rick DeNatale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/12/07, Pat Maddox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I would not mock the call, and would instead just let the mailer do > > its thing. You can verify that a message was sent, match the > > subject/content, etc. It's very lightweight so there's no reason not > > to use it. > > The problem with this is that it combines testing the sending of the > message with testing how it's rendered. > > I prefer to do the latter in the context of testing the mailer.
So then I would write two specs. One verifies that it was sent, and one verifies the content. You're combining them here as well, albeit in a less flexible (and apparently painful :) way. Pat _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
