On Jan 9, 2008 10:01 AM, Stefan Magnus Landrø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I totally agree with you, David! > > For quite a while I was testing all my methods (even had to declare them > protected/package scope in java!), but I realized that I was getting into a > lot of trouble. Now I've shifted to testing functionality in stead of > methods. > > Now, sometimes you might end up having small methods (typically a result of > refactoring) that are being used by several clients. In that case you should > start testing those methods, since they actually represent real business > logic.
I wonder whether that is a smell indicating that the functionality in those methods really belongs in its own class? Kerry -- http://www.kerrybuckley.com/ _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
