Well, I think it all depends on the scenario - but in a lot of cases it should absolutely be considered a code-smell.
Stefan 2008/1/9, Kerry Buckley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Jan 9, 2008 10:01 AM, Stefan Magnus Landrø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I totally agree with you, David! > > > > For quite a while I was testing all my methods (even had to declare them > > protected/package scope in java!), but I realized that I was getting > into a > > lot of trouble. Now I've shifted to testing functionality in stead of > > methods. > > > > Now, sometimes you might end up having small methods (typically a result > of > > refactoring) that are being used by several clients. In that case you > should > > start testing those methods, since they actually represent real business > > logic. > > I wonder whether that is a smell indicating that the functionality in > those methods really belongs in its own class? > > Kerry > -- > http://www.kerrybuckley.com/ > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > -- Bekk Open Source http://boss.bekk.no
_______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
