On 1/10/08, Nathan Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey, we're currently using shoulda (http://dev.thoughtbot.com/ > shoulda/) on a project and I saw some things that would be really nice > to see in rspec, namely the should_ methods, and especially the > should_be_restful method. Do these go against the rspec goals at > all? Or could an ambitious programmer go to town implementing these > for rspec_on_rails?
The current philosophy is to keep these kinds of things as plugins. A few of us have started to extract common matchers into a plugin which can be found at http://code.google.com/p/rspec-on-rails-matchers/. Feel free to submit a patch if we're missing something that you'd like. -- Josh Knowles phone: 509-979-1593 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://joshknowles.com _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
