Hmm, that includes a good number of them, but there's still the restful resource to think about, which is in my opinion the most valuable one. Would you consider the addition of a restful resource matcher similar to shoulda's?
Nathan Sutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] rspec 1.1 rspec_on_rails 1.1 rails 2.0.2 On Jan 10, 2008, at 5:40 PM, Josh Knowles wrote: > On 1/10/08, Nathan Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hey, we're currently using shoulda (http://dev.thoughtbot.com/ >> shoulda/) on a project and I saw some things that would be really >> nice >> to see in rspec, namely the should_ methods, and especially the >> should_be_restful method. Do these go against the rspec goals at >> all? Or could an ambitious programmer go to town implementing these >> for rspec_on_rails? > > The current philosophy is to keep these kinds of things as plugins. A > few of us have started to extract common matchers into a plugin which > can be found at http://code.google.com/p/rspec-on-rails-matchers/. > Feel free to submit a patch if we're missing something that you'd > like. > > > -- > Josh Knowles > phone: 509-979-1593 > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > web: http://joshknowles.com > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
