Hi David, On 14/06/2008, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Jun 14, 2008, at 12:50 PM, aidy lewis wrote: > > Hi, > > Is the Given, When, Then framework, the user story, the acceptance > criteria or both? > > From my talk at railsconf: > http://en.oreilly.com/rails2008/public/schedule/detail/2055 > > > ============================================= > Story: measure progress towards registration goals > As a conference organizer > I want to see a report of registrations > So that I can measure progress towards registration goals > > Scenario: one registration shows as 1% > Given a goal of 200 registrations > When 1 attendee registers > Then the goal should be 1% achieved > > Scenario: one registration less than the goal shows as 99% > Given a goal of 200 registrations > When 199 attendees register > Then the goal should be 99% achieved > ============================================= > > The story and the text before the first scenario is the User Story as we've > always known it in XP. > > The Scenarios are automated, and represent acceptance criteria. > > Make sense? > > Cheers, > David >
Certainly does. I am automating the tests (only tester on my project), but I have asked the BA's not only to write the story then, but also give the scenarios. I do a lot of re-work on the story though. Should I just be asking just for the story and for me to add the tests (Given, When, Then) I also asked them for negative scenarios. Aidy _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
