On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Jonathan Linowes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Aug 31, 2008, at 9:39 AM, David Chelimsky wrote: > >> Agreed. Stories and/or Features seem to be more about organization and >> communication. Scenarios drive code development. > > +1 > I also like to organize them into workflows, tasks, goals > Which makes me think maybe the scenario should be a more independent, > reusable item
We've talked about a tagging scheme that would allow you run scenarios in any logical combinations, but unless we want to go to one-scenario-per-file (which I, personally, don't), we still need a default organization scheme. WDYT? _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
