On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Joseph Wilk-2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>I like this much better. -Guiding people to use regexen properly is >>better than redefining their semantics. > > Well put. Do you mind if I add this David?
Well - it turns out that this is slightly more complicated. The code example in cucumber has these expressions: /Three \(\.\*\) mice/ /Three blind \(\.\*\)/ The proposed hint in the error message (appending $) does not really apply to this, and trying to cover all of the different possible reasons for ambiguity in steps seems counter productive to me. I did make one change (http://github.com/dchelimsky/cucumber/commit/ca70b3795906448e40f4d610dd0b6692ce987f1a) in my fork: I changed Amiguous to Multiple and the error message now reads: Multiple step definitions match "Three blind mice": ./spec/cucumber/step_mother_spec.rb:24:in `/Three (.*) mice/' ./spec/cucumber/step_mother_spec.rb:27:in `/Three blind (.*)/' I think this is a bit more clear than Ambiguous (that reads sorta funny). Aslak - if you agree, go ahead and pull/merge that commit. David > Thanks, > Joseph Wilk _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
