On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 4:00 PM, David Chelimsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Joseph Wilk-2 > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>I like this much better. -Guiding people to use regexen properly is >>>better than redefining their semantics. >> >> Well put. Do you mind if I add this David? > > Well - it turns out that this is slightly more complicated. The code > example in cucumber has these expressions: > > /Three \(\.\*\) mice/ > /Three blind \(\.\*\)/ > > The proposed hint in the error message (appending $) does not really > apply to this, and trying to cover all of the different possible > reasons for ambiguity in steps seems counter productive to me. > > I did make one change > (http://github.com/dchelimsky/cucumber/commit/ca70b3795906448e40f4d610dd0b6692ce987f1a) > in my fork: I changed Amiguous to Multiple and the error message now > reads: > > Multiple step definitions match "Three blind mice": > > ./spec/cucumber/step_mother_spec.rb:24:in `/Three (.*) mice/' > ./spec/cucumber/step_mother_spec.rb:27:in `/Three blind (.*)/' > > I think this is a bit more clear than Ambiguous (that reads sorta > funny). Aslak - if you agree, go ahead and pull/merge that commit. >
That's fine. Aslak > David > >> Thanks, >> Joseph Wilk > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
