> No idea why you couldn't pass a flag for regression testing: > > mock(Foo, :check_methods => true) > > Scott
It seems to me this way, too - though I'm obviously biased. :) It's true that a lot of the dynamic stuff could be problematic - what if the flag was only for checking methods directly implemented on that class? Though I guess that'd lead down a potential dark path where you'd then also want the "mock" method to potentially check all mixins and validate, etc. etc. On the other hand, maybe it could serve as a gentle remonstrance to folks to not overdo it with the "i am an 3l337 ninj4 haxx0r" metaprogramming? Just a thought. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
