David Chelimsky wrote:
This looks pretty cool. I wonder if you'd have any interest in making
this a bit more rspec-friendly? Something like an option to run it
like this:
expect_xpath do
It's on my do-list, but...
...are pluggable matchers as hard to write as the OP implied? How would you fix
his problem? I need to know that before diving into the spaghetti that Ruby
inevitably generates, just below every kewt DSL!
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
