Phlip wrote:
David Chelimsky wrote:
This looks pretty cool. I wonder if you'd have any interest in making
this a bit more rspec-friendly? Something like an option to run it
like this:
expect_xpath do
It's on my do-list, but...
...are pluggable matchers as hard to write as the OP implied? How
would you fix his problem? I need to know that before diving into the
spaghetti that Ruby inevitably generates, just below every kewt DSL!
The major problem is fixed:
http://github.com/yura/howto-rspec-custom-matchers/
But there are still few open questions in README.rdoc
Regards,
Yury
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
