David Chelimsky wrote:
When RSpec is used as customer facing, they see the docstrings
(strings passed to describe() and it()), not the internal code. That's
for developers.
Then why the .should stuff? I'm a developer - technically - and I never needed
it!
But enough sophistry: Back to business...
Take a look at
http://github.com/dchelimsky/rspec/blob/f6c75b1417d9178d4dcaaf9e892e23474d340ff6/lib/spec/matchers/wrap_expectation.rb,
I think it'll solve this problem.
This gives the same issue:
class BeXmlWith
def matches?(stwing, &block)
waz_xdoc = @xdoc
@scope.wrap_expectation self do
@scope.assert_xhtml stwing
return (block || @block || proc{}).call
end
ensure
@xdoc = waz_xdoc
end
attr_accessor :failure_message
The same error message for a stray nil:
1)
'/users/new should have xpathic tags' FAILED
You have a nil object when you didn't expect it!
You might have expected an instance of Array.
The error occurred while evaluating nil.first
./spec/views/users/new.html.erb_spec.rb:50:
line 50 is just this one:
response.body.should be_xml_with do
and yes the response.body is populated...
--
Phlip
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
rspec-users@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
