David Chelimsky wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:26 PM, James Byrne <li...@ruby-forum.com> > wrote: >> David Chelimsky wrote: >> >>> I'd rather always define our own so the results are consistent from >>> RSpec regardless of other frameworks in the midst. Does that make >>> sense to you? >> >> Instead of metaclass how about object_handle ? >> >> wdt? > > Go for it. I think that's good enough for now. It's for internal > consumption only. Also, I'm better at making naming decisions when I > see things in context, I may change it later if I come up w/ something > that speaks to me more clearly. > > Good?
OK. I have made the changes to the code in a local branch. I just need to stick the object_handle method in the right place and get the revised specs to pass. I should have a patch for you tomorrow. If not, then by Monday. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
