David Chelimsky wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 2:09 PM, James Byrne <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>>> � � � (Spec::Expectations::ExpectationNotMetError)
>> Rates</title>"
>> WDYT?
> I like the idea, though I think it's helpful to also have the strings
> in the case of String objects. But having the class and object id
> would really help tell the story we're looking for.
>
> wdYt?
I have come up with this spec. Before I poke at the code itself I would
like you to comment.
it "should display object and value, expected and actual, on
#failure_message" do
target = 1
matcher = equal("1")
matcher.matches?(target)
matcher.failure_message_for_should.should == \
"\n" +
"expected \"#{matcher.metaclass} => 1\"\n" +
" got \"#{target.metaclass} => 1\n" +
" \n(compared using equal?, did you mean '==')\n"
end
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
_______________________________________________
rspec-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
