On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Ashley Moran <ashley.mo...@patchspace.co.uk> wrote: > > This is a common mistake, and one I made for a long while even after being > familiar with RSpec. I wonder if there is justification for an AST pass > over spec files to catch this (among possibly other issues)?
The AST pass over the spec files already exists. It's what Ruby does when you run the specs, and these quirks are caught when your specs pass and you haven't done anything to make them pass yet. >8-> (You _do_ always start with failing specs, and then do the work to make them pass, right?) -- Have Fun, Steve Eley (sfe...@gmail.com) ESCAPE POD - The Science Fiction Podcast Magazine http://www.escapepod.org _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
