On Aug 7, 2010, at 5:28 PM, Ashley Moran wrote: > Hi > > Did the RSpec TMBundle ever have multiple ways of recognising RSpec files? > I'm convinced it user to look for "spec_helper" on the first line.
I'm pretty sure it never did that. > The Ruby bundle does something similar, as it looks for "firstLineMatch = > '^#!/.*\bruby';" > > The reason I ask is because I now have several files that end "_contract.rb". > Conceivably I might have other shared example files with different suffices. > But it's fairly safe to say they will all start with "require 'spec_helper'". I can't think of a case in which I've required spec_helper from a file that defines shared groups. So in my case, that is not safe to say :) > WDYT? I think it's good to do things that help end users, but we'd need a more reliable convention to base this on. Anybody (including Ashley) got any other suggestions? Cheers, David > Cheers > Ash > > -- > http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ > http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
