On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Rick DeNatale wrote: > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:45 PM, Elliot Winkler > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Phillip Koebbe <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Here's another idea that's not so great, but maybe it will spur some >>> thinking in someone else. What about a custom generator (or a flag on the >>> official one) that added something like a shebang line at the beginning of >>> example files. A short comment that identifies the file, like "# RSpec". >>> Then a TM bundle could pick up on that and be happy. >> >> Putting aside the fact that this is solving a very specific problem.... what >> about #!/usr/bin/env spec ? 99% of the time the shebang won't be used, I'd >> wager, so it'd pretty much be harmless. > > As I tried to point out, textmate looks for shebang lines to compare > against in the language definitions. Right now the rspec bundle > doesn't have a language definition since rspec files are really ruby > files and want to use that language definition. > > I guess I just don't see what's wrong with using the convention of > naming spec files with the suffix _spec.rb as Mr. Textmate suggests > http://blog.macromates.com/2007/file-type-detection-rspec-rails/ > > It's worked well for me for quite some time.
Hey Rick, Shared groups are typically stored in a file that has a different name, and ppl want access to all the code completion and syntax highlighting of spec files in those files. HTH, David > -- > Rick DeNatale > > Blog: http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/ > Github: http://github.com/rubyredrick > Twitter: @RickDeNatale > WWR: http://www.workingwithrails.com/person/9021-rick-denatale > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rickdenatale > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
