On 10 Aug 2010, at 15:03, Rick DeNatale wrote: > And easy to add yourself by just editing the bundle.
I've tried this before. Unfortunately, it just leads to pain when you try to update the bundle via Git >> Or... how about an actual dot-suffix, ".rspec", eg, >> "active_record_associations.rspec", which would be designed to indicate an >> RSpec-loadable file (prob shared example groups), but one that doesn't make >> sense to run alone (or can't be)? Any legs in that idea? > > I don't think I like that. For one thing most folks don't include the > dot suffix in require 'statements'. Good point, I forgot about that. Cheers Ash -- http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
