On 27 Mar 2011, at 03:43, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote: > Hi David and fellows, > > I know this subject has already been discussed here and there are already > some attempts to support the given-when-then-and syntax in Rspec, like the > links below: > > https://gist.github.com/206969 > https://github.com/jimweirich/rspec-given > > First, I don't understand the reason to adopt the capital method names > Given/When/Then/And instead of given/when/then/and. Then, I don't think we > can call this some real support for that syntax because "example" is not > meant to be executed in any special order in Rspec nor it can be defined that > any additional "then/and" should be aborted if a prior expectation wasn't > met. And both solutions seem to work by simple aliasing "example" and > "describe". > > I never used Cucumber because I find that working with it is cumbersome for > most cases. > > I've been working mostly with Grails on my daily job for about 2 years now > since I moved to my current job. I wanted something like Rspec for Groovy and > Grails and while searching for some alternative, I found EasyB: > > http://www.easyb.org/ > > Actually I liked the story syntax they provide as well as the reports and I > found it would be useful for Rspec to incorporate that style too: > > http://www.easyb.org/howtos.html > > What do you think?
Why not just use Cucumber? > > Best regards! > > Rodrigo. > > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users cheers, Matt m...@mattwynne.net 07974 430184 _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
