On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <lboc...@yahoo.com.br> wrote: > Em 27-03-2011 10:32, Matt Wynne escreveu: >> >> On 27 Mar 2011, at 03:43, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote: >> >>> Hi David and fellows, >>> >>> I know this subject has already been discussed here and there are already >>> some attempts to support the given-when-then-and syntax in Rspec, like the >>> links below: >>> >>> https://gist.github.com/206969 >>> https://github.com/jimweirich/rspec-given >>> >>> First, I don't understand the reason to adopt the capital method names >>> Given/When/Then/And instead of given/when/then/and. Then, I don't think we >>> can call this some real support for that syntax because "example" is not >>> meant to be executed in any special order in Rspec nor it can be defined >>> that any additional "then/and" should be aborted if a prior expectation >>> wasn't met. And both solutions seem to work by simple aliasing "example" and >>> "describe". >>> >>> I never used Cucumber because I find that working with it is cumbersome >>> for most cases. >>> >>> I've been working mostly with Grails on my daily job for about 2 years >>> now since I moved to my current job. I wanted something like Rspec for >>> Groovy and Grails and while searching for some alternative, I found EasyB: >>> >>> http://www.easyb.org/ >>> >>> Actually I liked the story syntax they provide as well as the reports and >>> I found it would be useful for Rspec to incorporate that style too: >>> >>> http://www.easyb.org/howtos.html >>> >>> What do you think? >> >> Why not just use Cucumber? > > I'll repeat myself: "I never used Cucumber because I find that working with > it is cumbersome for most cases". >
Have you tried Steak? https://github.com/cavalle/steak Aslak > That is really the reason :) I don't feel the need for the extra work. I > just want to use directly the syntax in the test code. Writing step > definitions besides the feature text seems too much work to me, while I > would like to do both at once, even if I don't get some english-only (or any > other language) specification. > > Regards, > > Rodrigo > _______________________________________________ > rspec-users mailing list > rspec-users@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users > _______________________________________________ rspec-users mailing list rspec-users@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/rspec-users
