Hi Eliot,
At 02:37 PM 20-11-2024, Eliot Lear wrote:
This list has been eerily quiet Way too quiet.
Some time ago after Heather left, the community decided to arrogate
to itself many of the powers previously held by the RFC Series
Editor. And so we developed RFC 9280, which has been around for
just about 2.5 years. We have in that time produced but a single
work, and we have at most three active authors (Paul, Heather, and
Alexis). Alexis' draft would reassign responsibility from this
group to the LLC or tooling team.
I wonder: did we make a mistake in our approach, and how should we
measure the work of this group?
The output of the model used by the SDO ranges from "works well" to
"highly unproductive". I could argue that this group is unproductive
given that it sent one document to the RFC Editor over the last 30
months. I could also argue that it is not a bad thing as more policy
does not necessarily make the RFC Editor model more efficient.
Someone [1] mentioned a (practical) problem in 2023. How much would
it cost to solve that problem before 24 December 2024?
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
1. https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rswg/YBNiQWpsZ_EJiQd2rdDa0IwMixs/
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
