Hi Carsten,
At 07:04 AM 30-11-2024, Carsten Bormann wrote:
One problem is that we need these changes implemented, and the tools
team has only limited capacity for that.
So I'm not sure that very near deadlines like the above are that useful.
But in general I think you are hinting at the right approach.
(Except that we don't seem to agree who would ultimately decide that
the fixes are good.)
In 2012, it was envisioned that the then-model relies on volunteer
participation. I doubt that there will be enough volunteers to fix
all the issues by the end of 2025. In addition, someone would have
to decide which issues to work on and which ones should be labelled
as "WONTFIX" (you mentioned that above).
The point which Eliot raised was about performance indicators. I
would have to look at the policy implementation to figure out which
actionable metric to suggest.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
--
rswg mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
