On 17/12/2024 01:11, Eric Rescorla wrote:
As a repeat errata ignoring offender, I don't think making the process
clearer is the issue.

+1

Whilst I was an AD the main problem with errata was the time it took
to acquire enough state to make a decision. With the errata setup as
was that was prohibitive, and I don't think that's changed since, and
as ekr says, the actual payoff for that effort (for the community) is
so low, there were far better ways to spend AD effort, despite all of
that looking "bad."

IMO, we need an entirely new approach, not any set of tweaks to the
currently utterly useless system, hence draft-farrell-errata.

Cheers,
S.

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
rswg mailing list -- rswg@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rswg-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to